ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Endovascular Stenting for Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Cervical Artery Dissection: Nationwide Study of Stroke Recurrence.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of anxiety and mood disorders on elective flow diversion for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: propensity score-matched analyses of two large databases.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2026Article
- Endovascular management of bilateral traumatic internal carotid artery dissections: A case report.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to cervical artery dissection (CAD), endovascular stenting can improve and maintain vessel patency for severely stenotic or occlusive lesions. Athough prior reports have suggested equivocal functional outcomes with stenting versus no stenting for AIS-CAD, there are currently no data on stenting and stroke recurrence. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of the 2016-21 Nationwide Readmissions Database in the United States. Adult patients hospitalized for AIS-CAD were included. Patients who did and did not undergo endovascular stenting were matched using propensity scores calculated using logistic regression models accounting for demographics, stroke severity, and comorbidities. The primary end point was recurrent ischemic stroke within 180 days. Secondary end points include outcomes of the index AIS-CAD hospitalization such as routine discharge to home without rehabilitation needs, death, and intracranial hemorrhage. Results: A total of 20 434 patients were included; 2368 (11.6%) underwent endovascular stenting. After propensity score matching, 2215 patients remained in the no stenting group, and 2244 remained in the stenting group. The stenting group had a significantly lower stroke recurrence risk than the no-stenting group within 180 days (hazard ratio 0.50 [95% CI: 0.27-0.95], Conclusion: For patients with AIS-CAD, endovascular stenting was associated with a lower rate of stroke recurrence. Although stenting was associated with a higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage, this phenomenon did not culminate in different rates of short-term morbidity or mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.