ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2026
Low-cost, handheld, multi-pulse electroporators for simplified nucleic acid delivery in skin.
Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early career innovators shaping the future of bioengineering and translational medicine.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Low-cost, handheld, multi-pulse electroporators for simplified nucleic acid delivery in skin.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroporation-mediated delivery offers a promising alternative to carrier-based nucleic acid delivery methods for vaccination and therapeutic applications. Carrier-based systems like lipid nanoparticles and viral vectors often suffer from poor in vivo stability, immunogenicity, toxicity, and off-target effects. To overcome the high cost, bulkiness, lack of portability, and painful administration of traditional electroporators, we developed the RotoPatch family of small, low-cost, hand-held piezoelectric electroporators that use microneedle electrodes for intradermal delivery of nucleic acids. Notably, these RotoPatch devices use a single rotary motion to administer multiple electroporation pulses through microneedle electrodes, that localize the electric field to the upper layers of the skin. In animals, RotoPatch facilitated greater intracellular uptake of firefly luciferase-encoded mRNA in mice and green fluorescent protein-encoded plasmid DNA in rats, as confirmed by bioluminescence and fluorescence imaging, respectively. RotoPatch produced similar in vivo expression as electroporation using a manually actuated, multi-pulse piezoelectric electroporator (ePatch) and a battery-powered, multi-pulse electroporator (eIgniter). These findings highlight the potential of multi-pulse piezoelectric microneedle electroporation for intradermal nucleic acid delivery as a platform for gene therapy and vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.