Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573290›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

Comparison of the Effect of Milk Booster Drops and Acupressure on the Milk Volume of Mothers with Premature Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nasim Pouresmaeili, Nahid Jahani Shoorab, Majid Sezavar, HamidReza Bahrami-Taghanaki, Mohammadtaghi Shakeri, Hassan Boskabadi, Golnazsadat Ahmadinejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nasim PouresmaeiliDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Nahid Jahani ShoorabDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Majid SezavarDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
HamidReza Bahrami-TaghanakiAcupuncture Department, Persian and Complementary Medicine Faculty, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammadtaghi ShakeriDepartment of Biostatistics, Social Determination of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hassan BoskabadiDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Golnazsadat AhmadinejadDepartment of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reducing the milk premature neonates receive threatens their lives and growth. Many studies have examined the effectiveness of milk booster drops and acupressure. This study aimed to compare the impact of milk booster drops and acupressure on milk volume in mothers with premature infants. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed in three Children's Specialized Hospitals of Mashhad, Iran, from June to November 2022. Fifty-four women with premature neonates were selected through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to milk booster ( Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the volume of milk measured by mothers before the intervention in the two groups ( Conclusions: Acupressure is more effective in increasing mothers' milk volume, so it is recommended that acupressure be taught to mothers in the neonatal intensive care units.

Indexed as

Acupressureintensive care unitsmilkpremature

Identifiers

PMID41573290
PMCPMC12823067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.