Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573281›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

Collegiality in Nursing: A Concept Analysis.

Mehrangiz Ghabimi, Ahmad Nasiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mehrangiz GhabimiStudent Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Ahmad NasiriDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Collegiality in nursing is crucial for fostering a positive work environment, promoting teamwork, and improving patient care outcomes. The aim of this study was to clarify the concept of collegiality in the nursing profession using the concept analysis method developed by Walker and Avant. We intended to generate knowledge that enhances the understanding of collegiality and its application in nursing research and clinical practice. Materials and Methods: The concept analysis of collegiality in nursing was guided by the eight stages of the Walker and Avant approach. A comprehensive review of the literature on Collegiality in nursing was conducted using the electronic databases Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and PubMed without a time limit until 2023. Results: Through the analysis conducted, collegiality in nursing is identified as a collaborative process, whether within the nursing profession or across different healthcare disciplines. It involves nurses working together as a team to address patient care or healthcare system issues. This entails respectful sharing of knowledge and resources among team members. Conclusions: Collegiality in nursing is vital for creating a supportive work environment, where nurses can freely seek assistance and guidance for their colleagues. This can lead to better decision-making and ultimately improves patient care outcomes. It also promotes teamwork and collaboration, which are essential for providing high-quality care. Additionally, collegiality plays a role in reducing workplace stress and burnout, benefiting both nurses and patients.

Indexed as

Collaborationconcept formationinterprofessional relationsnursing

Identifiers

PMID41573281
PMCPMC12823088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.