ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Risk factors for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a systematic review and meta-analysis supplemented by genetic causal assessment.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (PS) is a common, chronic, and recurrent condition with unclear pathogenesis. Previous studies have primarily focused on local factors, with limited causal validation of systemic risk factors. This study aims to synthesize observational and genetic evidence to systematically evaluate potential risk factors and explore possible multisystem pathological mechanisms. Methods: This study primarily employed a systematic review and meta-analysis by retrieving high-quality observational studies to quantitatively evaluate the associations between various risk factors-such as behavioral habits, metabolic and immune factors, and related diseases-and PS. Heterogeneity tests, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of the results. To further validate the causal nature of these associations, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) data was performed to explore potential genetic causal relationships. Results: A total of 19 observational studies were included, of which 12 were eligible for meta-analysis. The findings revealed that increased body mass index, sedentary behavior, dense body hair, family history, and poor hygiene were significantly associated with an elevated risk of PS. These associations were further supported by MR analyses. In addition, higher eosinophil counts and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels appeared to be protective factors. Conditions such as diabetes, hidradenitis suppurativa, acne, polycystic ovary syndrome, and osteoarthritis were also linked to increased PS risk. No significant associations were found between PS and smoking, alcohol consumption, sex hormones, hair color, skin color, excessive sweating, physical activity, or most lipid parameters. Conclusion: This study identified multiple risk factors for PS through meta-analysis and systematic review, and further provided genetic evidence of causality. The findings suggest that PS is not merely a localized condition but may be driven by systemic factors such as metabolic, inflammatory, and endocrine dysfunctions. These results underscore the importance of early identification of high-risk individuals and support the need for targeted lifestyle interventions. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251057814, identifier CRD42024618778.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.