Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573216›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Physiological, anatomical, and molecular responses of glanded and glandless cotton to chromium exposure.

Samrana Samrana, Abid Ali, Sayed Hussain, Hamid Ali, Uzair Muhammad, Kasim Sakran Abass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samrana Samrana *College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Abid Ali *College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Sayed HussainDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Chemical and Life Sciences, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Hamid AliDepartment of Bioscience, Comsats University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Uzair MuhammadCollege of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Kasim Sakran AbassCollege of Veterinary Medicine Department of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cotton seeds are a major source of high-quality proteins and edible oil, but their utilization is limited due to gossypol toxicity to humans and animals. For better use of cotton as food and feed, several glandless cotton cultivars have been developed, which are susceptible to various biotic stresses. However, their resistance to abiotic stresses, i.e., heavy metals, has rarely been studied. In the current study, the effect of different doses of chromium (Cr)-0, 10, 50, and 100 μM-on the physiological, anatomical, and molecular aspects of cotton was investigated. Genotypic variation exists in the response of cotton to Cr stress. Current results revealed that Cr caused inhibition in leaf biomass and ultrastructure damage, showing large intercellular spaces, thick cell walls, distorted nucleus and chloroplast, and a ruptured nuclear membrane. Cr affected the biochemical system and resulted in the reduction of net photosynthesis rate by 69.7%, intercellular CO

Indexed as

antioxidant activitieschromium (Cr)cottongene expressiongossypolleaves ultrastructure

Identifiers

PMID41573216
PMCPMC12819670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.