Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573184›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Prevalence and Angiographic Outcomes of Rescue Intracranial Stenting in Large Vessel Occlusion Following Stroke Thrombectomy - STRATIS.

Hamidreza Saber, Michael T Froehler, Osama O Zaidat, Ali Aziz-Sultan, Richard P Klucznik, Jeffrey L Saver, Nerses Sanossian, Frank R Hellinger, Dileep R Yavagal, Tom L Yao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MillipedeInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Hamidreza SaberDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery Dell Medical School University of Texas at Austin Austin TX.
Michael T FroehlerVanderbilt University, Medical Center Nashville TN.
Osama O ZaidatMercy St. Vincent Hospital Toledo OH.
Ali Aziz-SultanBrigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA.
Richard P KlucznikMethodist Hospital Houston TX.
Jeffrey L SaverDepartment of Neurology UCLA Los Angeles CA.
Nerses SanossianUniversity of South California Los Angeles CA.
Frank R HellingerFlorida Hospital Orlando FL.
Dileep R YavagalUniversity of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital Miami FL.
Tom L YaoNorton Neuroscience Institute Louisville KY.
Reza JahanDepartment of Radiology UCLA Los Angeles CA.
Diogo C HaussenEmory University School of Med/Grady Memorial Hospital Atlanta GA.
Raul G NogueiraUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh PA.
Nils H Mueller-KronastDelray Medical Ctr/Tenet South Florida Delray Beach FL.
David S LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology UCLA Los Angeles CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5109-8736
STRATIS Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large vessel occlusion secondary to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD-LVO) has an estimated prevalence of 7% to30%. There is a large variation in the use of intracranial rescue stenting in interventional practice. We aimed to characterize the frequency and characteristics of intracranial rescue stenting in a large cohort of endovascular therapy for stroke. Methods: The Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Stroke Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke (STRATIS) angiography core lab adjudicated the location of the occlusion, hyperdense vessel sign on initial imaging, the use of angioplasty and stenting, and imaging outcomes following endovascular therapy. Underlying cause of stroke was categorized into intracranial atherosclerosis, cardioembolic, and other subtypes. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between intracranial rescue stenting and imaging outcomes including intracranial hemorrhage, and arterial reperfusion using expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction reperfusion score in patients with ICAD-LVO. Results: Among 978 patients with LVO stroke undergoing endovascular therapy, 91 (9.3%) patients had ICAD-LVO. Baseline hyperdense vessel sign was observed among 44 (62.7%) with ICAD versus 178 (68.2%) with cardioembolic LVO ( Conclusion: In STRATIS, nearly 1 of every 11 thrombectomies were performed in patients with underlying ICAD, among whom 7.1% underwent rescue intracranial stenting concomitant with thrombectomy. Acute intracranial stenting as rescue therapy in ICAD-LVO was associated with favorable angiographic outcomes and low symptomatic hemorrhage rates.

Indexed as

endovascular therapyintracranial atherosclerotic diseaseischemic strokereperfusion

Identifiers

PMID41573184
PMCPMC12671625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.