ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Use of Cobalt-Chromium 64 Wires Surpass Evolve for the Treatment of Remnant Intracranial Aneurysms: A Subanalysis From the SEASE International Registry.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of the Surpass Evolve flow diverter for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) has shown promising results, but there are no studies that evaluated its effectiveness for remnant previously treated IAs. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Surpass Evolve for previously treated IAs. Methods: This subanalysis is derived from the SEASE (Safety and Effectiveness Assessment of Surpass Evolve) registry, a retrospective, multicentric, international cohort conducted across 15 academic institutions in North America and Europe between July 2020 and October 2022. Adult patients undergoing Surpass Evolve implantation for single saccular IAs were grouped into those with previously treated IAs by coiling or intrasaccular-devices and those with untreated IAs. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Results: This study included 257 patients with IAs. Of those, 66 patients had previously treated IAs (median time between diagnosis and initial treatment and retreatment: 6.28 months), and 191 patients had untreated IAs. Of the 246 patients with 10.5 months of imaging follow-up, the core lab adjudicated complete occlusion was less in previously treated IAs compared with untreated IAs (59.7% versus 72.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.21-0.88]; Conclusion: Our results revealed reasonable rates of occlusion and an acceptable safety profile for the use of Surpass Evolve to treat previously treated IAs. Future prospective studies with longer follow-ups are warranted to explore the findings further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.