ReviewResuscitation plus2026
Key physiological indicators and technological trends in physiology-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A narrative review.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrest remains a critical public health challenge with consistently low survival rates worldwide, underscoring the urgent need to optimize the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Physiology-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation, through real-time monitoring of parameters such as end-tidal carbon dioxide and diastolic blood pressure, enables clinicians to objectively assess cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and make adjustments in real time, advancing towards personalized resuscitation therapy. This review investigates the relationships between key physiological indicators - including coronary perfusion pressure, arterial blood pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and cerebral regional oxygen saturation - and compression parameters, along with their value for resuscitation outcomes. Moreover, it synthesizes current evidence supporting the efficacy of physiology-directed resuscitation. The review also addresses the limitations of invasive monitoring techniques and explores the application of noninvasive methods in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, providing critical analysis and insights into emerging technological trends in physiology-directed resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.