Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573074›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in ophthalmology2025

Imaging features of lacrimal gland disease.

Carmelo Caltabiano, Khizar Rana, Alexander Buckby, Sandy Patel, Dinesh Selva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carmelo CaltabianoDiscipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Khizar RanaDiscipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Alexander BuckbyCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Sandy PatelDiscipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Dinesh SelvaDiscipline of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lacrimal gland masses represent a diverse group of pathological processes, including inflammatory, lymphoproliferative, and neoplastic lesions. They often present as a palpable mass in the superolateral orbit. There is significant overlap in clinical presentation, and imaging with ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging is essential for further characterisation. Key radiological features such as laterality, lobe involvement, lesion composition, margin definition, enhancement pattern, and associated bony changes can significantly narrow the differential diagnosis. This review will describe the radiological features of lacrimal gland masses to guide decision-making.

Indexed as

adenoid cystic carcinomadacryoadenitislacrimal gland masslacrimal gland pathologylacrimal gland tumourpleomorphic adenoma

Identifiers

PMID41573074
PMCPMC12819838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.