Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573068›Full record

ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2025

Global bibliometric insights on prenatal exposures and pregnancy outcomes.

Pelin Koca, Elif Keskin Arslan, Ayse Ozkan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pelin KocaDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Izmir Bakircay University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkiye.
Elif Keskin ArslanDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Izmir Bakircay University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkiye.
Ayse OzkanDepartment of Physiology, Izmir Bakircay University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrenatal exposure to medications or environmental agents may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects. This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric overview of the global research landscape on prenatal exposures and associated outcomes.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the Web of Science database on November 11, 2024. Articles and reviews addressing prenatal exposures and pregnancy outcomes, indexed in the Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index-Expanded, or Emerging Sources Citation Index, were screened. Data were analyzed and visualized using VOSviewer, the R-package Bibliometrix, and Microsoft Excel 2021.

resultsA total of 3,361 articles were analyzed. Publications on this topic have steadily increased over the past two decades, peaking in 2022. The United States emerged as the most productive country, followed by China and Canada. Gideon Koren was identified as the most prolific author, while Reproductive Toxicology published the highest number of articles. Among the keywords, "pregnancy" remained the most frequent overall; however, "placenta," "adverse pregnancy outcomes," and "systematic review" peaked in 2022, while "meta-analysis," "outcomes," and "stillbirth" peaked in 2021.

conclusionThis bibliometric study highlights the global evolution of scientific research on prenatal exposures and pregnancy outcomes. The findings offer valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, enabling a better understanding of the dynamic trends and emerging areas in this field.

Indexed as

Birth defectspregnancyprenatal exposureresearch trendswomen

Identifiers

PMID41573068
PMCPMC12821097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.