Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41573022›Full record

ArticleMedical acupuncture2025

Observer-Blind Randomized Crossover Trial of Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture in Diagnosis and Treatment Points for Neck Pain and Shoulder Stiffness in Healthy Participants.

Soichiro Kaneko, Tetsuharu Kamiya, Shin Takayama, Ryutaro Arita, Rie Ono, Akiko Kikuchi, Minoru Ohsawa, Takuya Suematsu, Fumiya Omata, Sachie Kasukabe and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical acupuncture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Soichiro KanekoDepartment of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tetsuharu KamiyaDepartment of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shin TakayamaDepartment of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Ryutaro AritaDepartment of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Rie OnoDepartment of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Akiko KikuchiDepartment of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Minoru OhsawaDepartment of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Takuya SuematsuTohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Fumiya OmataTohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Sachie KasukabeNiigata University of Health and Welfare, Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Niigata, Japan.
Manami SuzukiTohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tadashi IshiiDepartment of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture (YNSA) uses microsystems in the body for various treatments. In YNSA diagnosis, Hoku is important for determining the treatment side. The A-point is used for treating neck and shoulder symptoms, and the D-point for low back pain; however, no studies support this. Aim: To investigate the site specificity of stimulation at the A-point and the usefulness of Hoku diagnosis. Methods: Nineteen healthy adults with no previous acupuncture experience were included. Participants randomly received three sessions of A-point, D-point, or no stimulation, followed by a 1-week minimum washout period. The visual analog scale (VAS) of shoulder stiffness, pressure pain threshold (PPT), and muscle hardness were evaluated at the bilateral shoulder region before, during, and 20 min after the stimulation, with the observer blinded to group allocation. Results: No significant differences were found in PPT between the three groups. Significant differences in VAS were observed between the three groups and in the comparison between the A-point and the control group. Intragroup analysis showed a significant improvement in the A-point and none in the D-point group. In subjects who had tenderness and induration on the right side of Hoku, the VAS score was significantly improved between the groups and multiple comparisons between the A-point and the control. The effect size was greater when limited by the Hoku diagnosis. Conclusion: The stimulation point selected according to the diagnosis point information might be more effective in YNSA. However, the results of this study were based on healthy adults, so the effect size was small. In the future, large-scale studies on patients with symptoms are needed.

Indexed as

Hoku diagnosispressure pain thresholdstiff shouldersYamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture

Identifiers

PMID41573022
PMCPMC12820698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.