ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Functional generalized estimating equation model to detect glaucomatous visual field progression.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo build a functional generalized estimating equation (GEE) model to detect glaucomatous visual field progression and compare the performance of the proposed method with that of commonly employed algorithms.
methodsTotally 716 eyes of 716 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) with at least 5 reliable 24-2 test results and 2y of follow-up were selected. The functional GEE model was used to detect perimetric progression in the training dataset (501 eyes). In the testing dataset (215 eyes), progression was evaluated the functional GEE model, mean deviation (MD) and visual field index (VFI) rates of change, Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) and Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) scores, and pointwise linear regression (PLR).
resultsThe proposed method showed the highest proportion of eyes detected as progression (54.4%), followed by the VFI rate (34.4%), PLR (23.3%), and MD rate (21.4%). The CIGTS and AGIS scores had a lower proportion of eyes detected as progression (7.9% and 5.1%, respectively). The time to detection of progression was significantly shorter for the proposed method than that of other algorithms (adjusted
conclusionThe functional GEE model shows the highest proportion of eyes detected as perimetric progression and the shortest time to detect perimetric progression in patients with POAG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.