ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Postoperative effective lens position and refraction changes with three different types of intraocular lens.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative Intraocular Lens Position and Refractive Stability in Cataract Surgery: Influence of Target Refraction and IOL Design.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Research on refractive power calculation formula of intraocular lens based on the principle of double thick lens imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate and compare alterations in the effective lens position (ELP) and refractive outcomes among three distinct intraocular lens (IOL) types.
methodsPatients with cataracts were enrolled and allocated to 3 groups: Group A (implanted with the SN6CWS), Group B (implanted with the MI60), and Group C (implanted with the Aspira-aA). ELP measurements were obtained with swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) at 1d, 1wk, 1mo, and 3mo postoperatively. Subjective refraction assessments were conducted at 1wk, 1mo, and 3mo following surgery.
resultsThe study included 189 eyes of 150 cataract patients (66 males). There were 77 eyes in Group A, 55 eyes in Group B, and 57 eyes in Group C. The root mean square of the ELP (ELP
conclusionAmong the three IOLs examined, the SN6CWS IOL showes the greatest stability during the first 3mo postoperatively. Between 1wk and 3mo after surgery, notable hyperopic shifts are evident in eyes implanted with the MI60 and Aspira-aA IOLs, whereas refractive outcomes remain relatively constant in eyes implanted with SN6CWS IOLs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.