ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Visual prognosis following open globe injury: clinical characteristics and risk factors from Vietnam National Eye Hospital.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- External Long-Term Validation of the Retinal Detachment After Open Globe Injury (RD-OGI) Score in a Large Single-Center Cohort: A Retrospective Study with Up to Two Years of Follow-Up.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with visual prognosis in patients with open globe injuries (OGIs) treated at Vietnam National Eye Hospital.
methodsA prospective observational study included patients with OGIs treated between June 2023 and June 2024. Data on demographics, injury features, and clinical findings were extracted from medical records. Poor visual outcome was defined as final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) worse than 20/400 or no light perception. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors.
resultsAmong 509 patients (636 eyes), the mean age was 35.13y (range 20-51y), and 67.6% were male. After treatment, the proportion of eyes achieving ≥20/40 increased from 12.6% to 42.1%, while no light perception decreased from 29.1% to 9.4%. Independent predictors of poor visual outcomes included delayed admission [>4h, odds ratio (OR)=3.33, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.76-6.33,
conclusionPoor visual outcomes remain common after OGIs, despite improve visual acuity in many cases. Several clinical and injury-related factors are strongly associated with prognosis. Early recognition of these predictors can support risk stratification and improve trauma care in similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.