ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Pharmacological and light-driven pupillary accommodation in guinea pigs: comparative effects of muscarinic modulators and illumination across developmental stages.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the effects of different light intensities and various mydriatic and miotic drugs on pupil accommodation in guinea pigs.
methodsForty-two-week-old guinea pigs were randomly divided into four groups to assess pupillary responses under varying light intensities (100, 250, 500 lx) and pharmacological interventions (1% atropine, 1% cyclopentolate, 1% tropicamide, or 2% pilocarpine). Baseline pupil size and eccentricity were recorded using a non-contact Python-based imaging system integrating edge detection and pixel-to-distance conversion. Direct illumination effects were measured at sequential time points, followed by drug administration and longitudinal tracking of pupillary changes. The protocol was repeated at 12wk of age for developmental comparisons. Post-experiment, enucleated eyes were analyzed to evaluate
resultsSignificant age-dependent differences in pupil dynamics were observed. Both 2- and 12-week-old guinea pigs exhibited marked pupil constriction under direct illumination (
conclusionThis study investigates pupillary responses in developing guinea pigs, revealing a direct pupillary light reflex (PLR) with light intensity-dependent responses, while indirect PLR was undetectable. The differential effects of muscarinic modulators on pupillary responses underscore the critical role of cholinergic signaling in ocular accommodation, with age-related variations in sensitivity. Additionally, a novel non-contact measurement methodology achieved a precision of 0.01 mm for pupillary quantification, enhancing accuracy in ocular studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.