ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2026
Dental Crowding Categorization Network (DCC-Net): Explainable deep learning system for automatic categorization of dental crowding on intraoral photographs.
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Since categorization of dental crowding is a crucial parameter in orthodontic diagnosis and tooth-extraction decisions, we aimed to develop an automatic system to categorize crowding levels on intraoral photographs without space analysis. Methods: The Dental Crowding Categorization Network (DCC-Net), consisting of segmentation, extraction, and categorization modules, was proposed and optimized by extracting regions of interest and crown centroids. A multicenter dataset including 1,351 maxillary and 1,253 mandibular intraoral photographs was divided in an 8:2 ratio for model training and internal testing, and an additional 100 photographs were collected for external testing. The ground truth was obtained through measurements by experienced orthodontists using intraoral scanning data. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of the categorization module were calculated, and heatmaps were obtained for model interpretation. Furthermore, a clinical evaluation was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of junior orthodontists with and without the assistance of DCC-Net. Results: For the maxilla, the categorization accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were 0.7232, 0.7447, 0.6793, and 0.6962, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for categorization in the mandible were 0.7352, 0.7506, 0.6723, and 0.7019, respectively. The heatmaps indicated that DCC-Net could identify the dental arches and regions showing malocclusion. In the clinical evaluation, the diagnostic accuracy of junior orthodontists improved with DCC-Net's assistance, increasing by 9.18% for the maxilla and 12.75% for the mandible. Conclusions: DCC-Net achieved accurate categorization of dental crowding on intraoral photographs. Its rapid predictions may offer insights for guiding tooth extraction in orthodontic treatment, providing valuable reference data for inexperienced orthodontists and improving doctor-patient communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.