ReviewThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi2026
[Current Status of Robotic Therapeutic Endoscopic Platforms].
Review in The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visualizing the development of robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a comprehensive bibliometric study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy have expanded its role from diagnosis to definitive therapy, leading to a paradigm shift in the management of gastrointestinal diseases. As therapeutic endoscopic procedures become increasingly complex, there is a growing demand for enhanced precision, stability, and control beyond the capabilities of conventional endoscopes. In response, various robotic endoscopic platforms have been developed to improve visualization, dexterity, and procedural safety, particularly for technically demanding interventions such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Robotic therapeutic endoscopy systems can be broadly categorized into multitasking robotic platforms and robotic add-on platforms. Multitasking platforms enable bimanual manipulation, triangulation, and effective tissue traction but are often limited by high cost, system complexity, and workflow constraints. In contrast, robotic add-on platforms are designed to integrate with conventional endoscopes, offering improved maneuverability and traction with minimal disruption to clinical practice. Recent preclinical and early clinical studies, including first-in-human and randomized pilot trials, have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted ESD, with potential benefits in procedural efficiency, learning curve reduction, and operator workload. Despite ongoing challenges related to cost-effectiveness, device integration, and widespread commercialization, robotic endoscopy represents a promising therapeutic platform. Continued technological refinement and accumulation of clinical evidence are expected to further define its role in advancing precision, standardization, and accessibility in therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.