Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41572622›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2026

Development of the abdominal musculature in the chicken embryo.

Margarethe Draga, Luke Orth, Julia Khabyuk, Vanessa Holtwick, Johanna Heinen, Felicitas Pröls, Martin Scaal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margarethe DragaInstitute of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Luke OrthInstitute of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Julia KhabyukInstitute of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Vanessa HoltwickInstitute of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Johanna HeinenInstitute of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Felicitas PrölsInstitute of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin ScaalInstitute of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5654-6895

Funding

University of Cologne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The abdominal musculature is of prime importance for stabilization and flexion movements of the trunk, and of high clinical relevance in hernia surgery. Despite a number of severe congenital malformations involving defective abdominal muscle formation, little is known about abdominal muscle development during embryogenesis. Here, we used the chicken model system to investigate anatomy, morphogenesis, segmental origin, and fiber formation of the abdominal musculature. The specific anatomy of the chicken abdominal musculature was first determined by macroscopic dissections of adult specimens. We then describe the sculpting of the external oblique, internal oblique, transversus, and rectus muscles from a uniform hypaxial muscle blastema on the basis of whole-mount embryos and sections. We show that abdominal muscles arise from somites 24-28, that all abdominal muscles receive muscle cells from multiple somites, and that somites 25 and 26 provide the major source of abdominal muscle cells. We find that the contribution of individual somites to distinct muscle portions is heterogeneous, with a roughly segmental arrangement of muscle fibers in the transversus muscle, and a random mix of fibers of different segmental origin in the rectus muscle. We furthermore show that despite extensive fiber mixing, there is no fusion between fibers of different segments, so that the segmental identity of individual fibers in the abdominal muscle sheets is maintained. We present abdominal muscle formation as a paradigm for the development of large, segment-crossing trunk muscles from segmental myotomal anlagen.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesMuscle DevelopmentAnimalsChick EmbryoSomitesabdominalchickendevelopmentembryomusclemuscle fibermyotomesomite

Identifiers

PMID41572622
PMCPMC13399026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.