ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
A Biomarker-Based Dose-Schedule Optimization Design for Immunotherapy Trials.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose optimization of immune checkpoint inhibitors for gastrointestinal malignancies.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- A Biomarker-Based Dose-Schedule Optimization Design for Immunotherapy Trials.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In immunotherapy, both the dose and the schedule of drug administration can significantly influence therapeutic effects by modulating immune system activation. Incorporating immune response measures into clinical trial designs offers an opportunity to enhance decision-making by leveraging their close association with therapeutic efficacy and toxicity. Motivated by settings where biomarker data indicate improved efficacy in biomarker-positive patients, we propose a dose-schedule optimization strategy tailored to each biomarker-defined subgroup, based on elicited utility functions that capture risk-benefit tradeoffs. We introduce a joint modeling framework that simultaneously evaluates immune response, toxicity, and efficacy, enabling information sharing across outcome types and patient subgroups. Our approach utilizes parsimonious yet flexible models designed specifically to address challenges due to small sample sizes commonly encountered in early-phase trials. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed design achieves desirable operating characteristics and effectively informs dose-schedule optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.