ReviewKnee surgery & related research2026
Patient selection and management for successful cementless total knee arthroplasty.
Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The application of artificial intelligence in the design of highly compatible knee prostheses: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Radiographic features of bone ingrowth in highly porous cementless total knee arthroplasty with minimum 2-year follow-up.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- Preoperative Thrombocytopenia Increases In-Hospital Burden but Not Postoperative Adverse Events After Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Early Survivorship Analysis of a Modern Anatomic Cementless Tibial Baseplate: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely performed procedure for end-stage arthritis, with cemented fixation historically dominating owing to its immediate stability and ability to compensate for minor bone defects. However, concerns over the long-term durability of cemented implants, particularly in younger and more active patients, have renewed interest in cementless TKA as a viable alternative. Advances in implant design, including hydroxyapatite coatings and porous metal surfaces, have improved clinical outcomes, reducing early loosening and enhancing biological fixation. Proper patient selection is crucial for the success of cementless TKA. Studies suggest that younger patients, those with good bone quality, and even some elderly or obese individuals may benefit from cementless implants. While initial migration of the tibial component is more pronounced in cementless TKA, research indicates that this stabilizes over time without impacting long-term outcomes. In addition, pharmacologic interventions, such as bisphosphonates and teriparatide, may help enhance periprosthetic bone density and implant fixation. Despite promising results, challenges remain, particularly in patients with osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and smoking-related bone health issues. Further research is needed to refine selection criteria, optimize surgical techniques, and ensure long-term success. As next-generation cementless implants continue to evolve, ongoing studies will be essential in guiding patient management strategies for improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.