ArticleJournal of cardiovascular imaging2026
What is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction in healthy adults? A meta-analysis of population-based echocardiographic studies.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransthoracic echocardiography derived left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a cornerstone in heart failure risk prevention. However, the lower limits of normal LVEF remains imprecisely defined. We aimed to define normal LVEF ranges by sex, age group, and self-reported race/ethnicity using data from population-based echocardiographic studies.
methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE for studies published between January 1, 2000, and January 3, 2025, that reported the mean and standard deviation of LVEF measured by 2D or 3D echocardiography in healthy, community-based adult populations.
resultsIn 10 studies (n = 10,427; female sex, 48%), the pooled mean LVEF was 62.8% (95% confidence interval, 61.0%-64.7%), with estimated lower and upper normal limits of 51.8% and 73.2%, respectively. Women had higher mean LVEF (63.7%) than men (61.9%), with corresponding lower normal limits of 52.7% and 51.7%, respectively. LVEF was similar across age groups. Individuals of Asian origin had 2 to 3 percentage points higher LVEF than Black or White individuals, with lower normal limits of 54% for women and 53% for men. Fewer than 1% of women and approximately 1% of men would be expected to have an LVEF below 50%. Across all demographic subgroups, the probability that an LVEF < 50% is within the normal range was < 5%. There was significant heterogeneity of the included studies (e.g., τ
conclusionsIn healthy adults, the lower limit of normal LVEF is approximately 53% for women and 52% for men, with slightly higher thresholds among individuals of Asian origin. An LVEF < 50% is highly unlikely to reflect normal function, regardless of sex, age, or self-reported race/ethnicity. Given the high statistical heterogeneity, the results should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.