ArticleBMC nutrition2026
"When they stop coming, we lose them": a qualitative study assessing health workers' experiences on treatment default during outpatient therapeutic care for severe acute malnutrition at Gulu regional referral hospital, Uganda.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOutpatient therapeutic care (OTC) programs are essential for managing severe acute malnutrition (SAM) among children under 5 years. However, default rates in northern Uganda remain high- reaching up to 21.9%. This study explored the experiences of health workers delivering OTC services on outpatient therapeutic care treatment default at Gulu regional referral hospital (GRRH).
methodsThis was a qualitative descriptive study that employed phenomenology. Semi structured interviews were conducted with nine purposively selected health workers. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically.
resultsSix core themes emerged from the data analysis: organization of the OTC program, causes of treatment default, consequences of default, management and prevention strategies, programmatic challenges, and recommendations for program improvement. Many health workers described multiple drivers of default, including structural and systemic barriers (e.g., long distances, transport costs, RUTF stockouts, staff absenteeism, and seasonal farming), caregiver-level challenges (e.g., Domestic violence, long distances, transport costs, family separation, poverty, seasonal farming, inadequate social support, and cultural beliefs), health literacy gaps (e.g., misinformation, misconceptions and negligence), and child-level clinical complications (comorbidities e.g., HIV, TB, cerebral palsy).
conclusionsOutpatient therapeutic care treatment default is driven by a complex intersection of health system and structural limitations, caregiver socio-economic challenges, and child-related factors. Addressing these requires strengthening defaulter tracing via systematic tracking and community follow up, decentralizing OTC services to lower level facilities with dedicated staff, and ensuring consistent RUTF supply, staffing, and clinic schedules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.