ArticleBMC psychology2026
AI literacy and psychosocial factors shaping Chinese university students' attitudes and behavioral intentions toward generative AI use.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Associations of AI Literacy, AI Self-Efficacy and AI Attitudes Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Path Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Using Generative AI in Learning and Students' Innovative Behavior: A Dual-Path Examination Based on the UTAUT Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of college students' AI literacy and their association with AI acceptance: the sequential indirect role of perceived affordances and growth mindset.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenerative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping higher education by influencing students’ learning, cognition, and academic decision-making. Understanding the factors that associated with students’ acceptance of this technology is crucial for its successful integration. This study extends the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) by incorporating attitude as a mediator and AI literacy as an antecedent to investigate psychological factors associated with GenAI adoption among Chinese university students.
methodA cross-sectional survey design was employed. Data were collected from 1,536 Chinese university students via an online questionnaire. The instrument included validated scales measuring AI literacy (awareness, evaluation, ethics), UTAUT constructs (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions), attitude, behavioral intention, and use behavior. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the hypothesized relationships.
resultsPerformance expectancy (β = 0.345, p < 0.001), social influence (β = 0.154, p < 0.001), and facilitating conditions (β = 0.118, p < 0.05) were positively correlated with students’ attitudes toward GenAI. Performance expectancy (β = 0.266, p < 0.001), effort expectancy (β = 0.078, p < 0.05), and social influence (β = 0.283, p < 0.001) were linked to behavioral intention. Attitude was positively associated with behavioral intention (β = 0.192, p < 0.001), whereas its direct association with use behavior was small and non-significant after FDR correction (β = 0.060, p > 0.05); instead, behavioral intention showed a strong positive association with use behavior (β = 0.257, p < 0.001). Among AI literacy dimensions, awareness (β = 0.137, p < 0.001) and evaluation (β = 0.101, p < 0.001) were positively associated with attitudes, while ethics demonstrated a non-significant negative relationship (β = − 0.038, p = 0.148). The model explained 50.7% of the variance in attitude and 47.6% in behavioral intention.
conclusionsThe findings presented herein highlight the relevance of AI awareness, evaluative competence, performance expectancy, and social endorsement for understanding students’ positive evaluations and intentions regarding GenAI use. Attitude emerges as a central affective correlate that connects these cognitive appraisals with students’ reported behavioral intentions. Taken together, these patterns may inform efforts to design AI literacy initiatives in university curricula and supportive learning environments that emphasize informed awareness, critical evaluation, and ethical reflection, thereby fostering more psychologically informed and responsible engagement with GenAI in higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.