ReviewBreast cancer research : BCR2026
Caution over haste: why novel endocrine therapy in early lines should wait in Estrogen receptor positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer.
Review in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid development of novel endocrine therapies (ETs), such as selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists (SERCAs), and complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs) has generated enthusiasm for their use in earlier treatment lines in advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) human epidermal receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC). Multiple phase III trials have demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for novel ETs, especially in patients harboring ESR1 mutations. However, their broader use may be limited by toxicity concerns, adherence challenges, need for combination therapy, and financial burden. In this manuscript, we provide a concise review of key clinical trial outcomes for novel ETs with a focus on SERDs and critically evaluate their use in earlier lines of therapy. We also examine the design of ongoing adjuvant and first-line trials and explore the clinical implications of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-guided treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.