ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Magnetostaltic pumping in an ex vivo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation model.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a critical rescue therapy for severe respiratory or cardiac failure. However, current blood pumps generate high shear stresses that can damage blood components, leading to hemolysis, loss of von Willebrand factor multimers, and increased risks of bleeding, thrombosis, and organ injury.
methodsWe developed novel magnetostaltic pumps that use magnetic liquid interfaces instead of solid walls to transport blood, aiming to reduce mechanical stress on blood cells. Four magnetostaltic pump designs were tested in ex vivo ECMO circuits using human donor blood at clinically relevant flow rates and compared with standard centrifugal and peristaltic pumps.
resultsAcross all flow rates, magnetostaltic pumps produced less hemolysis than conventional pumps. Under pediatric flow conditions (1 L/min for 48 h), the large-scale magnetostaltic pump (QR3) reduced hemolysis by approximately one-third compared with commercial centrifugal pumps and preserved high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor multimers. Platelet function was unaffected. Small amounts of nanoparticle leakage from the magnetic fluid were detected but remained well below toxic thresholds.
conclusionsMagnetostaltic pumping offers a promising alternative to current ECMO pumps by reducing blood damage. These results support further testing in animal models to evaluate the potential for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.