Observational studyBMC women's health2026
Returning to work after breast cancer diagnosis: a cross-sectional study of socioeconomic and clinical factors associated with return to work in Luxembourg.
Observational study in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding return to work after breast cancer through real-world data linkage framework: a Luxembourg digital oncology use case.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers affecting women globally, with consequences for health, quality of life, and socioeconomic status. Return-to-work (RTW) represents an important milestone for women affected by BC. This study analyses clinical, sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors associated with RTW among women in Luxembourg after BC diagnosis, aiming to identify factors associated with RTW outcomes.
methodsThis study, conducted under the RELIANCE project, involved an observational, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based pilot study addressing RTW among women diagnosed with BC. Eligible participants were women diagnosed with BC between 2013 and 2018, aged < 65 years at diagnosis, employed in Luxembourg at that time and who had undergone an examination at Service de santé au travail multisectoriel. Of 452 invited women, 164 (39% response rate) completed the questionnaire. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were conducted to assess associations between clinical, socio-demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and RTW outcomes.
resultsOverall, 83% of participants returned to work after BC. Advanced higher education was independently associated with higher odds of RTW (OR = 44.0; 95% CI: 1.52–1272.0; p = 0.028), while higher education showed a borderline association (OR = 6.07; 95% CI: 0.96–38.4; p = 0.055). Experiencing premature menopause was also associated with increased odds of RTW (OR = 8.54; 95% CI: 1.58–46.1; p = 0.013). Absence of comorbidities before BC was associated with higher RTW (p = 0.032). Job satisfaction improved after BC (median 7 to 8), while perceived work ability declined (median 9 to 7). In the multivariable linear model, work ability before BC was significantly associated with higher job satisfaction after BC (coefficient = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.02–0.54; p = 0.036), and job satisfaction before BC showed a positive but non-significant association.
conclusionSocioeconomic factors, particularly educational attainment, and clinical factors such as premature menopause were independently associated with RTW outcomes among women affected by BC in Luxembourg. Job satisfaction after BC was influenced by women’s work ability before BC, with workplace social support contributing to a lesser extent. Targeted interventions addressing educational disparities, along with workplace support initiatives, are essential to improving RTW outcomes in this population. Longitudinal studies are needed to explore these associations further and identify potential intervention points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.