Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41572219›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Implementing cancer prevention in occupational healthcare: initial insights from occupational healthcare staff in Central and Southern Europe - findings from the CPW project.

Catharina Roth, Magdalena Kostrzewa, Giulia Collatuzzo, Valentina Biagioli, Monireh Sadat Seyyedsalehi, Stefano Giordani, Alessandro Godono, Marina Ruxandra Otelea, Dana Mates, Florina Georgeta Popescu and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Catharina Roth *Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. catharina.roth@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Magdalena Kostrzewa *Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Giulia CollatuzzoDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, 20122, Italy.
Valentina BiagioliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Monireh Sadat SeyyedsalehiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Stefano GiordaniOnconauti Association, Metropolitan Oncology Network, via Paolo Nanni Costa 12/4A, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro GodonoDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Piazza Polonia 94, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Marina Ruxandra OteleaColentina Clinical Hospital, Soseaua Stefan Cel Mare 19-21, Bucharest, 02012, Romania.
Dana MatesNational Institute of Public Health, Dr. Leonte Anastasievici Street 1-3, District 5, Bucharest, 050463, Romania.
Florina Georgeta PopescuClinical Department 5, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest. 37, Dionisie Lupu St, Sector 2, Bucharest, 020021, Romania.
Adonina TardonHealth Research Institute of Principality of Asturias (ISPA), Avenida del Hospital, 33013, Oviedo and Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nebrija, Campus Berzosa, Madrid, 28248, Spain.
Guillermo Fernandez-TardonHealth Research Institute of Principality of Asturias (ISPA), Avenida del Hospital, 33013, Oviedo and Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nebrija, Campus Berzosa, Madrid, 28248, Spain.
Marta Maria Rodriguez-SuarezHealth Research Institute of Principality of Asturias (ISPA), and HUCA-SESPA, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
Eleonóra FabiánováDepartment of Occupational Health, Regional Authority of Public Health, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Jana BérešováDepartment of Occupational Health, Regional Authority of Public Health, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Zuzana KlöslováDepartment of Occupational Health, Regional Authority of Public Health, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Miriam Kočtúchová BlažinováOccupational Health Services, Železiarne Podbrezová a.s, Podbrezová, SK, Slovakia.
Viktória ĎurajováF.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska, Bystrica, Slovakia.
Iulia CrullRomanian Society of Occupational Medicine, Bucharest, Romania.
Anna Schneider-KampDepartment of Business and Management, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark.
Paolo BoffettaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
Michel WensingDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective primary cancer prevention in occupational health care settings requires strategies tailored to workforce needs and individual risk profiles. Cultural, perceptual, and behavioural factors influence implementation success. Occupational healthcare professionals (OHCPs), with their expertise and regulatory responsibilities, are critical for advancing workplace cancer prevention. This study evaluates the feasibility of primary cancer prevention programs within the Cancer Prevention at Work (CPW) project across Europe from OHCP perspective.

methodsCPW is a Horizon Europe funded cross-sectional pilot study (2023–2026) conducted in Italy, Romania, Slovakia, and Spain. It focuses on HCV (Hepatitis C Virus) and Hp (Helicobacter pylori) screening and HPV (Human Papillomavirus) counselling among workers. OHCPs involved in program implementation completed a survey assessing their perceptions of the programs, contextual factors, and their professional role in delivery. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree), with higher scores indicating more positive assessments, supportive contexts, and greater OHCP engagement. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and exploratory analyses.

resultsFifty-five OHCPs completed the survey. Findings suggest that integrating primary cancer prevention into occupational health is feasible. All three programs received positive evaluations (Mean Scores: 4.18–4.23; SD: 0.35–0.38), and organizational conditions, such as resources and leadership support, were rated favorably (Mean Scores: 4.24–4.73; SD: 0.42–0.61). OHCP involvement was moderately high (Mean Scores: 3.69–3.79; SD: 0.34–0.41), indicating meaningful engagement while highlighting opportunities for improvement. Assessments varied by setting and worker group, with more positive evaluations in hospitals and among healthcare or financial workers compared to metal workers. Contextual factors differed across groups, reflecting variability in perceived feasibility and ease of implementation.

conclusionConditions for the successful implementation of primary prevention programs targeting HCV, Hp, and HPV related cancers in occupational health services seem present. Particularly, if supported by favourable contextual factors and facilitated by employee participation. These findings offer preliminary evidence for the scalability of workplace-based cancer prevention strategies across diverse European health systems.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelNeoplasmsOccupational HealthOccupational Health ServicesPrimary PreventionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHepatitis CHumansMaleMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsPilot ProjectsSlovakiaHCVHelicobacter pyloriHepatitis C virusHpHPVHuman papillomavirusOccupational health surveillancePrimary cancer preventionScreeningWorkplace health program

Identifiers

PMID41572219
PMCPMC12836969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.