ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
The subjective experiences of patients recovering from delirium in acute geriatric care: An analysis of quantitative and qualitative interview data.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Multicomponent programs in delirium prevention and delirium management in older adults : Evidence, guideline recommendations and perspectives on delirium-sensitive care].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium occurs in about one fourth of hospitalized older adults and is associated with multiple adverse outcomes. Despite efforts to improve the prevention and treatment of delirium, it remains a burden for patients, their relatives, and healthcare professionals. Currently, little is known about how people experience delirium episodes.
methodsA sample of 77 inpatients who had been recently treated for delirium were recruited from acute geriatric care units at four hospitals. A semi-structured interview was conducted to explore memories and feelings associated with the delirium episode. The interview included both, dichotomous answers (yes/no) as well as the possibility to provide in-depth comments. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analysed with content analysis. After three months, a follow-up interview was conducted with a subgroup (n = 29) via telephone.
resultsA majority (n = 66, 85.7%) of participants could recall the delirium episode. The main emotion reported by patients related to the previous delirium episode were anxiety and/or fear (67.5%, n = 52). Visual hallucinations and/or dream-like experiences were recalled by nearly 60% (n = 46). Approximately one-fourth (n = 21) reported that they felt fully recovered from the episode, although another 25% (n = 21) reported lasting symptoms. Three months after the initial interview, ten participants reported persistent negative feelings associated with the episode of delirium. Conversations with staff and family members were found to be the most helpful intervention during and after the delirium. Likewise, guidance on orientation was found to be helpful during delirium.
conclusionsAnxiety and/or fear were the most common feelings reported after recovering from delirium. Negative memories and anxiety about cognitive decline were prevalent among those who failed to cope with delirium. Opportunities to talk about delirium and to provide reassurance to those affected should be integrated in usual care.
trial registrationhttps//www.drks.de/on07/01/2022 (DRKS00024078).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.