ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Effect of regulated and controlled deficit irrigation on yield and yield response factor of processing tomato.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deficit irrigation (DI) can help conserve water and alleviate the issue of water scarcity. For this purpose, two field experiments were conducted in 2023 and 2024 to evaluate a strategy involving reduced water use without compromising the yield production of processing tomato (cv. Castle Rock) in a typical arid environment of Egypt. In 2023, regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) was applied at 100% (V100), 80% (V80), 60% (V60), 40% (V40), and 0% (V0) of evapotranspiration (ET) following plant establishment. In 2024, controlled deficit irrigation (CDI) was applied at 100% (V100) or 50% (V50) during the whole growing season, 50% reduction up to the first fruit set, then 100% restoration (V50-100), and 100% until the beginning of ripening, then 50% reduction (V100-50), and 0% (V0) as in the previous year. In 2023, RDI decreased yield by 9.1, 26.2, and 51.1% for treatments V80, V60, and V40, respectively, with a remarkable increase in water productivity (WP) for all treatments compared to V100. In 2024, CDI included a reduction of water early in the season (V50-100) did not lead to significant losses in yield but resulted in a water saving of 25% compared to (V100), while the yield was negatively affected by the reduction of water late in the season (V100-50). Water productivity was positively affected by both treatments but V50-100 appreciably increased WP. Yield response factor (Ky) with values less than one in both years showed relative tolerance of tomato to water deficit. The sensitivity of tomato to deficit irrigation was higher when water was applied at different intensities with RDI (Ky = 0.96) than at individual growth stages with CDI (Ky = 0.87). These results indicate the priority of deficit irrigation during the vegetative growth stage to improve crop yield, conserve water and enhance water productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.