ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
A negative binomial latent factor model for paired microbiome sequencing data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding the reproductive microbiome: enabling clinical and biological insights through machine and deep learning.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrobiome sequencing data are often collected from several body sites and exhibit dependencies. Our objective is to develop a model that enables joint analysis of data from different sites by capturing the underlying cross-site dependencies. The proposed model incorporates (i) latent factors shared across sites to explain common subject effects and to serve as the source of correlation between the sites and (ii) mixtures of latent factors to allow heterogeneity among the subjects in cross-site associations.
resultsOur simulation studies demonstrate that stronger associations between two sites lead to greater efficiency loss in regression analysis when such dependence is ignored in modeling. In a case study involving samples collected from a study on the female urogenital microbiome with aging, our model leads to the detection of covariate associations of the vaginal and urine microbiomes that are otherwise not statistically significant under a similar regression model applied to the two sites separately.
conclusionsWe propose a latent factor model for microbiome sequencing data collected from multiple sites. It captures the presumptive underlying cross-site associations without compromising estimation accuracy or inference efficiency in the absence of such associations. In addition, our proposed model improves predictive performance by enabling the prediction of microbial abundance at one site based on observations from another. We also provide an extended framework that allows for clustering of subjects (samples) and cluster-specific levels of paired association. Under this extended framework, clusters can be classified according to their association strengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.