ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Modified Johannesburg technique sets the standard - superior biomechanical stability in chest tube fixation.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChest tube dislodgement is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication after thoracic trauma. Reliable fixation is essential, particularly in emergency and combat casualty care. Several suture techniques exist, but comparative biomechanical evidence is limited.
methodsThis prospective biomechanical cadaveric study compared three fixation techniques-Purse String (PS), Roman Sandal (RS), and Modified Johannesburg (JO) technique -across three tube sizes (20, 24, 28 Charrière) and two materials (polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and silicone). A total of 360 tests were performed on porcine thoracic wall specimens under standardized conditions. Specimens were subjected to vertical load-to-failure testing with continuous measurement of force and elongation.
resultsThe Modified Johannesburg technique consistently demonstrated the highest pull-out strength across all tube sizes and materials, significantly outperforming both RS and PS (p < 0.0001). RS ranked second and showed significantly greater stability than PS in all conditions (p < 0.0001). Effect size analysis revealed large differences between JO and PS (r = 0.87) and between RS and PS (r = 0.50), and a medium effect between JO and RS (r = 0.36). PVC tubes provided significantly greater pull-out strength than silicone tubes (147.0 ± 54.2 N vs. 128.5 ± 42.2 N; p = 0.01071), although silicone tubes exhibited greater elongation prior to failure. Tube size had a modest influence on stability, with larger tubes tending toward higher pull-out strength, but pairwise differences did not reach significance. The predominant failure mechanism was suture rupture (78.9%), followed by tube rupture (11.1%), knot loosening (8.1%), and skin failure (1.9%).
conclusionsThe Modified Johannesburg Technique offers superior biomechanical stability for chest tube fixation, regardless of tube size or material. This technique should be considered the preferred method in high-risk environments, including military and emergency care, to minimize dislodgement and enhance patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.