Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41572048›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026

Association of anesthesia methods for limb and lower abdominal surgeries with postoperative outcomes in patients requiring home oxygen therapy: a nationwide cohort study in Japan.

Kotaro Sakurai, Chikashi Takeda, Sachiko Tanaka-Mizuno, Toshiyuki Mizota, Moritoki Egi, Koji Kawakami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kotaro SakuraiDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoecho, Sakyoku, Kyoto, 6068501, Japan.
Chikashi TakedaDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoecho, Sakyoku, Kyoto, 6068501, Japan.
Sachiko Tanaka-MizunoDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoecho, Sakyoku, Kyoto, 6068501, Japan.
Toshiyuki MizotaDepartment of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Shogoin Kawaramachi, Sakyoku, Kyoto, Japan.
Moritoki EgiDepartment of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Hospital, Shogoin Kawaramachi, Sakyoku, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji KawakamiDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoecho, Sakyoku, Kyoto, 6068501, Japan. kawakami.koji.4e@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-4071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHome oxygen therapy (HOT) is administered to patients with impaired pulmonary function who cannot adequately oxygenate themselves to meet systemic metabolic demands. Although regional anesthesia (RA) is beneficial for patients requiring HOT, comparative evidence between regional and general anesthesia (GA) is lacking. Thus, this study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between RA and GA in patients requiring HOT.

methodsWe collected data from a nationwide hospital-based database spanning from April 2014 to June 2022. We included patients who received HOT before limb or lower abdominal surgery and divided them into those who received GA and those who received RA. The primary outcome was 30-day hospital-free days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, postoperative pulmonary complications, and non-pulmonary complications. Additionally, we calculated the propensity scores and applied the overlap weighting method. Unmeasured confounders were addressed using high-dimensional propensity scores.

resultsAmong 1064 included surgeries, 565 and 499 were assigned to the GA and RA groups, respectively. Post-adjustment, no significant difference in hospital-free days was observed between the GA (10.46 days) and RA (11.29 days) groups (hospital-free day difference: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: - 0.56 to 2.23; p = 0.24). No significant between-group differences were observed in secondary outcomes, including 30-day mortality (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.56; p = 0.67) and postoperative pulmonary complications (OR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.68-1.48; p = 0.99). Additionally, no difference was noted between the main analysis and the high-dimensional propensity score results for primary and secondary outcomes.

conclusionsOur findings suggest no association between the anesthesia method used and the 30-day hospital-free days among patients requiring HOT.

Indexed as

AbdomenAnesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, GeneralExtremitiesHome Care ServicesOxygen Inhalation TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreTreatment OutcomeCohort studyDimensional propensity scoresFree daysGeneral anesthesiaHighHome oxygen therapyHospitalNationwidePostoperative complicationRegional anesthesia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.