Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571958›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026

Diagnosis, risk stratification and management of smouldering multiple myeloma.

Saurabh Zanwar, Shaji Kumar, S Vincent Rajkumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saurabh ZanwarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-8453
Shaji KumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-9284
S Vincent RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. rajkumar.vincent@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-1833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New therapies have markedly improved survival outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, the onset of active disease, as defined by the 2014 International Myeloma Working Group SLiM-CRAB criteria, is often linked to substantial and irreversible morbidity. MM always develops from an asymptomatic precursor state called smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM). The clinical trajectory of SMM varies considerably; low-risk SMM often has an indolent course, similar to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, whereas nearly half of the subset of patients with high-risk SMM have progression to symptomatic MM within 2 years. Highly active treatments for MM, which remains an incurable disease, are being investigated for the management of SMM, with the aim of delaying or even preventing such progression. Both early therapeutic intervention and active surveillance are reasonable management options for patients with high-risk SMM, with decisions individualized through a detailed risk-benefit discussion with the patient. In this Review, we discuss current approaches for diagnostic evaluation, risk stratification and management of SMM, as well as future challenges and emerging opportunities in the field.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaSmoldering Multiple MyelomaDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionHumansRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.