ArticleRheumatology international2026
Patient perspectives on clinical trial participation for novel advanced therapies: a focus group study in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To identify barriers and facilitators in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) regarding participation in clinical trials for novel/advanced agents, such as cellular therapies. Adults from our SLE research registry participated in 1-hour virtual focus groups concerning their perspectives on clinical trials for novel/advanced SLE therapies. Sessions, facilitated by trained moderators, were recorded and transcribed. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used to code the data and generate themes/sub-themes. Nineteen patients participated in four focus groups (two in English, two in French). The mean age (range) was 50.0 (21–77) years and mean disease duration was 21.4 years. Most (90%) participants were female and 79% (15/19) were White, with the remainder being Black, Asian, and Hispanic. Few had previously participated in a clinical trial. Six major themes emerged: two barriers and four facilitators to trial participation. The first barrier was time and logistical constraints, such as employment and travel. The second was risk aversion, including subthemes of concerns of SLE flare, drug side effects and early-phase trials. Facilitators included receiving clear, detailed trial information. Disease instability was another driver, making patients increasingly willing to accept elevated health risks, time commitment and/or logistical challenges. Desire to support the lupus community was also an important factor. Finally, access in clinical trials to mental health counsellors, peer support, and close medical follow-up were strong facilitators of participation. We identified potential barriers and facilitators/driving factors for SLE patients regarding clinical trial participation, which are particularly relevant for novel/advanced agents like cellular therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41571944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.