Observational studyWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026
The rise of WHO-priority pathogens in central line associated bloodstream infection: Challenging the AWaRe paradigm in critical care.
Observational study in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Should I stay or should I go? DNA damage thresholds drive stay-or-go decisions inJournal of bacteriology · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of the aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) and its modified version for early detection of central line-associated bloodstream infection: a pilot study using machine learning techniques.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) pose a serious threat to critically ill patients, particularly in low- and middle-income countries facing rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Integrating WHO's Priority Pathogen Lists (PPL) and AWaRe antibiotic classification into CLABSI surveillance provides a clinically meaningful framework to guide antimicrobial stewardship and infection control. We conducted an observational study in ICUs from 2021 to 2024. Patients with central lines in situ for ≥ 2 calendar days were evaluated using CDC-NHSN definitions. Isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing (CLSI M100). Pathogens were classified using WHO PPL 2024 and analysed as per AWaRe categories. Clinical outcomes were correlated with pathogen class and resistance profile. Among 5,398 ICU patients, 102 developed laboratory-confirmed CLABSIs. Of these, 76.5% were caused by WHO-priority pathogens-63 bacterial and 15 fungal. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii predominated, especially in trauma ICUs (88.6%, p = 0.0493). Over 95% of bacterial isolates were resistant to all Access and Watch antibiotics, necessitating the use of Reserve agents like colistin. Among fungal isolates, Candida auris emerged as the most resistant species, while C. tropicalis retained full susceptibility. Mortality was 100% in patients infected with high-priority bacterial pathogens and 85.7% with high-priority fungal pathogens. This study is the first to map CLABSIs against the WHO PPL and AWaRe frameworks, highlighting a convergence of high-risk infections, therapeutic exhaustion, and poor outcomes. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted stewardship, enhanced surveillance, and policy-level AMR interventions in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41571937What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.