Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571932›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Using ultrasound to assess connective tissue quality in spine surgery: cutoffs and predictive value for adjacent segment disease.

Erika Chiapparelli, Ali E Guven, Jiaqi Zhu, Marco D Burkhard, Krizia Amoroso, Bruno Verna, Anna-Maria Mielke, Jennifer Shue, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Erika ChiapparelliHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA. chiapparellie@HSS.EDU.
Ali E GuvenHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Jiaqi ZhuHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Marco D BurkhardHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Krizia AmorosoHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Bruno VernaHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Anna-Maria MielkeHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Jennifer ShueHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Frank P CammisaHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Federico P GirardiHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Andrew A SamaHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Alexander P HughesHospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA. hughesa@hss.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCollagen integrity is essential for connective tissue maintenance, and its deterioration may contribute to postoperative complications. Dermal ultrasound (US) echogenicity has been associated with collagen quality, with changes in echogenicity reflecting alterations in collagen composition. These changes may indicate increased susceptibility to revision surgery in lumbar fusion patients, particularly due to adjacent segment disease (ASD). However, no study has established a specific cutoff value for skin US echogenicity to predict the need for ASD-related revision surgery. This single-center prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the association between dermal echogenicity and ASD revision, and to determine echogenicity cutoff values that could help identify patients at higher risk of requiring revision surgery.

methodsPatients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion from 2014 to 2023 were included. US measurements were conducted at two standardized locations on the lumbar back. Echogenicity values for the average dermal (AD), upper dermal (UD), and lower dermal (LD) layers were calculated using our institution's PACS imaging software. Statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

resultsAmong 383 patients (51% female, median age 63), those undergoing ASD revision were significantly older (median age 66.8 vs. 62 years, p = 0.012). Higher echogenicity in the LD (OR = 1.03, p = 0.008), UD (OR = 1.03, p = 0.027), and AD (OR = 1.03, p = 0.005) layers was associated with increased ASD risk. The optimal LD echogenicity cutoff was 124.3 (AUC = 0.654, sensitivity = 0.6, specificity = 0.69).

conclusionWe identify echogenicity cutoff values that correlate with an increased risk of revision surgery for ASD. Higher dermal US echogenicity may reflect alterations in collagen, contributing to poorer tissue quality. These findings support the use of dermal US parameters as a potential biomarker for high-risk lumbar fusion patients.

Indexed as

Connective TissueLumbar VertebraePostoperative ComplicationsSpinal FusionAgedCollagenFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReoperationUltrasonographyCollagenASDCollagenConnective tissueCutoffEchogenicityRevisionSpineUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.