ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Social media data and its potential for pharmacovigilance: a comparative analysis of reported prevalences regarding drug-induced gingival overgrowth (DIGO).
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Cardiologists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Calcium Channel Blocker-Induced Gingival Overgrowth.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced gingival overgrowth (DIGO) is an increasingly relevant topic among dentists, physicians and patients as well. Due to high prescription rates of calcium channel blockers, anticonvulsants and immunosuppressants, the prevalences of this adverse effect should not be underestimated. To identify differences in the prevalence rates presented, but also possible similarities in the available data, we compared information from package leaflets, social media platforms, current literature and summaries of product characteristics. To obtain a comprehensive overview of the current situation regarding DIGO, various sources were used for data collection. The social media platforms Facebook, YouTube, X, TikTok and Instagram were examined using various search terms, and the posts were then evaluated. Triggers of DIGO, treatment strategies, prevalences and the country of origin of the gathered posts were recorded. In addition, given causes and prevalences were extracted from package inserts (PIs), Summaries of product characteristics (SmPCs) and a scientific textbook. The collected data was matched to the corresponding daily defined doses (DDDs) in order to create a standardised database. Regarding the mentioned prevalences, a very heterogeneous distribution was found, depending on the social media platform used and the population size of the respective country. The results show that more drugs than currently known are linked to DIGO, and the prevalence rates described in various sources differ substantially from each other. Moreover, no linear relation between the size of the population and the percentage of contributing posts in the examined countries was found. Professionals should take different sources into consideration to decide which drug is likely to cause gingival overgrowth and which substance has a strong safety profile. Data from PIs and SmPCs alone are not sufficient to make reliable statements about ADRs and thus the drug safety of a particular active ingredient. Social media platforms offer a largely untapped opportunity for the early identification of adverse drug reactions and should be used for the post-market surveillance of pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.