ArticleScientific reports2026
Dialectal substitution as an adversarial approach for evaluating Arabic NLP robustness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From promise to practice: artificial intelligence in mental health care in the MENA region.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) have led to significant enhancements in Arabic natural language processing (NLP). However, their robustness remains insufficiently explored, particularly in adversarial settings. Most existing Arabic NLP systems are predominantly trained on Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), whereas real-world Arabic text frequently incorporates dialectal forms that diverge lexically and morphologically. To evaluate the impact of this distributional mismatch between training data and deployment conditions, this paper introduces dialectal substitution as a black-box token-level adversarial method against DNN-based MSA classification systems. Our approach identifies the most influential token in an input sequence via a scoring function and replaces it with a dialectally equivalent form using a fine-tuned Arabic dialectizer. The proposed attack demonstrates how dialectal substitutions can diminish the classification accuracy of the models, exposing vulnerabilities in DNN-based models trained on MSA corpora. We reveal a significant gap in current Arabic NLP systems, which fail to resist the diglossia nature of the Arabic language. We encourage researchers to pursue more robust and generalizable models that consider all forms of Arabic dialects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.