Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571875›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dialectal substitution as an adversarial approach for evaluating Arabic NLP robustness.

Basemah Alshemali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Basemah AlshemaliCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Taibah University, Yanbu, 46421, Saudi Arabia. bshemali@taibahu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) have led to significant enhancements in Arabic natural language processing (NLP). However, their robustness remains insufficiently explored, particularly in adversarial settings. Most existing Arabic NLP systems are predominantly trained on Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), whereas real-world Arabic text frequently incorporates dialectal forms that diverge lexically and morphologically. To evaluate the impact of this distributional mismatch between training data and deployment conditions, this paper introduces dialectal substitution as a black-box token-level adversarial method against DNN-based MSA classification systems. Our approach identifies the most influential token in an input sequence via a scoring function and replaces it with a dialectally equivalent form using a fine-tuned Arabic dialectizer. The proposed attack demonstrates how dialectal substitutions can diminish the classification accuracy of the models, exposing vulnerabilities in DNN-based models trained on MSA corpora. We reveal a significant gap in current Arabic NLP systems, which fail to resist the diglossia nature of the Arabic language. We encourage researchers to pursue more robust and generalizable models that consider all forms of Arabic dialects.

Identifiers

PMID41571875
PMCPMC12901007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.