ReviewDrugs & aging2026
Methotrexate for Osteoarthritis: What Does the Evidence Say?
Review in Drugs & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, characterised by chronic pain and reduced quality of life. Despite its prevalence, pharmacotherapy options remain limited. Inflammation has emerged as a promising target, with anti-inflammatory agents used in other rheumatological conditions, such as methotrexate (MTX), being explored for OA treatment. MTX is a cornerstone therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), owing to its broad immunomodulatory properties and well-established clinical efficacy. This review summarises evidence from seven randomised controlled trials and two observational studies investigating MTX in knee and hand OA. Studies varied considerably in terms of sample size, study population, MTX dosage and follow-up duration. Overall, study outcomes were conflicting in terms of MTX effect on OA symptoms. However, trials with larger sample sizes and higher MTX doses (> 15 mg/week) consistently reported benefits for pain in knee and hand OA, with a favourable safety profile, supporting MTX as a potential OA treatment. There is still a need for further research to refine dosing strategies, assess longer term use and evaluate cost-effectiveness. Given the complex heterogeneity of OA, stratification by OA phenotype, particularly consideration of local and systemic inflammation, may also be important to underpin selection of a population most likely to respond to MTX treatment. Considerations for the use of MTX in older adults, where comorbidities and polypharmacy may impact use, will also be essential for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41571874What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.