ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Evaluation of large language models for diagnostic impression generation from brain MRI report findings: a multicenter benchmark and reader study.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Incremental Diagnostic Value of Clinical Information for Large Language Models Across Multiple Organs: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Clinical AI Beyond Development: A Scoping Review of Deployment-Related Robustness, Algorithmovigilance, and Lifecycle Oversight.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The effects of multitype prompt engineering for large language models in hypertension treatment decisions.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatically deriving radiological diagnoses from brain MRI report findings is challenging due to high complexity and domain expertise. This study evaluated 10 large language models (LLMs) in generating diagnoses from brain MRI report findings, using 4293 reports (9973 diagnostic labels) covering 15 brain disease categories from three medical centers. DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest performance among the evaluated models on the full dataset and across different clinical scenarios and subgroups, particularly when provided with structured report findings and clinical information. A top three differential-diagnosis prompting strategy achieved superior performance, with 97.6% patient-level accuracy versus 87.1% for single-diagnosis prompting. The diagnostic performance of six radiologists was assessed with and without DeepSeek-R1 assistance on 500 reports. Integration of DeepSeek-R1 significantly improved diagnostic accuracy (AUPRC: 0.774-0.893) and reduced reading time (from 61 to 53 s), with more pronounced benefits for junior radiologists. Our findings indicate that effective automated diagnostic impression generation in brain MRI reporting requires advanced large-scale LLMs like DeepSeek-R1. With optimized prompting and input strategies, this framework may serve as a supportive tool in drafting brain MRI reports and contribute to enhanced workflow efficiency in radiology practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.