ArticleScientific reports2026
Horizontal saccade bias results from combination of saliency anisotropies and egocentric biases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Saccadic eye movements shift the fovea between objects of interest to build a visual percept. In humans, saccades are predominantly executed along the cardinal axes, particularly in the horizontal direction. It is unknown how this horizontal saccade bias could arise mechanistically, though previous work suggests contributions from neural, image-based, and ocular motor factors. Here we used two publicly available eye movement datasets to first investigate which image features-spatial frequency, saliency, and structural content-relate to the horizontal saccade bias. Among the three image features, we found that orientation anisotropies in saliency content best predicted the strength of the horizontal saccade bias. Based on this result, we next implemented a saccade target selection model combining allocentric biases aligned with image orientation and egocentric biases aligned with eye or head orientation, independent of image content. As in prior work, this combination successfully replicated human saccade distributions during free viewing of upright images. When applied to tilted images, the model produced effects of image tilt and saccade size that were correlated with prior empirical findings, though with reduced amplitude, suggesting that current saliency models do not fully capture image effects. Taken together, these results suggest that saccade generation reflects both the allocentric biases present in the structure of natural scenes and the egocentric biases present in the saccade generation system itself. An open question is why the egocentric saccade bias exists, but our results suggest that it is adaptive in response to regularities in the world and our typical upright orientation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.