ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel approach for dynamic task scheduling for IOT in fog-cloud environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fog Task Scheduling Using Quality-Source-Driven Multi-Anchor Synchronized Search Algorithm.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid expansion of real-time, latency-sensitive Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications has revealed the limits of centralized cloud infrastructures and driven computation toward a hierarchical IoT-fog-cloud continuum. Scheduling in this environment is challenging due to resource heterogeneity, dynamic arrivals and deadlines, and competing objectives such as latency, energy, and cost. This paper introduces Quantum-inspired Biased Dynamic Scheduler (QBDS), a novel scheduling framework that optimizes a configurable Composite Objective Function (COF) combining makespan, total energy consumption, total cost, load balance, resource utilization, and temporal metrics (waiting and response times). QBDS uses (1) a priority-aware task ranking that adaptively weights deadline slack, execution length, memory footprint and data size to form a globally informed execution order; (2) a sinusoidal, quantum-inspired biasing mechanism that perturbs normalized task and node metrics via randomized mixing weights and sine modulation to escape local optima and encourage exploration of underused resources; and (3) a penalty-aware multi-objective cost evaluator for assignment decisions. Extensive experiments, including ablation studies and comparisons with state-of-the-art metaheuristics and classical heuristics, demonstrate that QBDS consistently improves makespan, energy, cost, and resource utilization across diverse workloads and topologies, while scaling robustly under heavy load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.