ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimization of academic performance and mental health in college students through an AI-driven personalized physical exercise and mindfulness intervention system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Health Sector: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Metaheuristic-optimized cross-modal attention networks for multimodal mental health assessment in college students.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2026Article
- Research on artificial intelligence in stress and obesity: A bibliometric analysis using scopus, web of science, PubMed.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research examines an artificial intelligence-driven personalized intervention system that integrates physical exercise and mindfulness practices to support academic performance and psychological wellbeing among university students in eastern China. A 16-week controlled intervention study enrolled 328 undergraduate students from three comprehensive universities, comparing three conditions: AI-personalized interventions (n = 110), standardized interventions (n = 108), and controls (n = 110). The AI system employed machine learning algorithms to analyze multidimensional student data and generate tailored recommendations. Results indicated that the AI-personalized group was associated with larger improvements across academic metrics (10.28% GPA increase, 95% CI [8.94, 11.62], d = 0.89, p < 0.001), psychological parameters (36.7% stress reduction, 95% CI [33.2, 40.1], d = 1.42, p < 0.001), and physiological indicators (28.4% HRV improvement, 95% CI [24.8, 32.0], d = 1.13, p < 0.001) compared to standardized interventions and controls. Regression analysis identified intervention adherence, sleep quality improvement, and stress reduction as factors associated with outcomes. The hybrid neural network architecture combining student feature analysis, exercise matching, and mindfulness adaptation offers a framework for personalized health interventions in academic settings. These findings, while promising, are specific to Chinese university contexts with particular cultural and technological characteristics, and cross-cultural validation remains necessary before broader generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.