Trial reportScientific reports2026
Prospective randomized trial of triple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with choledochoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure for acute abdominal pain.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical value of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones: a retrospective analysis.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) combined with choledochoscopy and primary closure without T-tube drainage in managing acute abdominal pain caused by choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stones, CBDS) and cholecystolithiasis with acute cholecystitis. A single-center prospective study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Beijing Fengtai Youanmen Hospital, from April 2024 to February 2025. Sixty-one patients with acute abdominal pain due to CBDS and cholecystolithiasis with acute cholecystitis were randomized into two groups: T-tube-free group (n = 35), Triple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + LCBDE with primary closure; T-tube group (n = 26), Four-port LC + LCBDE with T-tube drainage. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Baseline characteristics were comparable (all P > 0.05). The T-tube-free group demonstrated superior outcomes in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, duration of abdominal drainage, and hospital stay (all P < 0.05). Each group had one case of biliary leakage, both resolved conservatively. No mortality, pancreatitis, conversion to open surgery, residual stones, biliary hemorrhage, or strictures occurred in either group. Triple-port LC combined with LCBDE and primary closure without T-tube drainage is safe and feasible for acute abdominal pain. Compared to T-tube drainage, this approach better aligns with the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.