ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-enabled prediction of hemorrhagic transformation post-thrombectomy using quantitative DSA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to construct a predictive model for post-thrombectomy hemorrhagic transformation (HT) by integrating hemodynamic features derived from quantitative DSA (qDSA) with machine learning models. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with acute anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion who underwent MT at our center from January to December 2024. Immediate postoperative anteroposterior and lateral angiograms of the target vessels were obtained after MT. Hemodynamic features such as mean transit time (MTT) and time to peak (TTP) were all calculated based on the time density curve derived from postoperative DSA. Clinical baseline data and interventional procedural information were also collected. Hemodynamic features associated with post-thrombectomy HT were selected using 5 different feature selection algorithms. Five machine learning models were employed to fit the features influencing the outcomes, and the results were evaluated using the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The predictive performance of different models was compared using the area under the curve (AUC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for model interpretation. A total of 171 patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion who underwent MT were included. Hemorrhagic transformation occurred in 68 patients. In contrast, the non-HT group comprised patients with the absence of intracranial hemorrhage or large cerebral infarction or cerebral herniation. In 171 patients, 39 hemodynamic parameters within the ROIs of the target vessels were extracted from perfusion images generated by postoperative DSA in each patient. After feature selection, the best-performing model on the testing set was the Elastic-Logistic model consisted of qDSA and clinical features, with an average AUC of 0.86. And the best-performing model on the testing set consisted of qDSA features alone, was the most frequently selected qDSA features still constructed using a logistic model, with an average AUC of 0.81. By integrating clinical and hemodynamic features, machine learning algorithms can be effectively utilized to construct a preliminary predictive model for post-thrombectomy HT in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.