ArticleScientific reports2026
Postural stability during a longitudinal expedition in an isolated and confined Antarctic environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postural stability is critical for safety in extreme environments like Antarctica, where falls pose a significant risk to expedition crews. However, systematic longitudinal studies from this setting are lacking. In the first such study, we repeatedly assessed postural control in thirteen members of a 49-day Antarctic mission using a low-cost, autonomous system under four sensory conditions (firm surface vs. compliant surface × × eyes open vs. eyes closed). We hypothesized that postural stability would initially deteriorate due to acute stress and environmental novelty, followed by gradual recovery and adaptation over the mid-term . Our comprehensive analysis revealed a marked deterioration of stability when visual or proprioceptive input was compromised, manifesting as increased sway and a shift toward less complex, more persistent control dynamics. Contrary to our hypothesis, no systematic longitudinal adaptation was detected. These findings highlight the increased reliance on visual information when proprioceptive cues are unreliable and suggest that postural strategies remain remarkably stable during a medium-term polar mission. Despite its known technical limitations, our work demonstrates the practical feasibility of using this autonomous system for field stabilometry in isolated environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.