ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation and management in neonates: a 10-Year clinical experience.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the neonatal intensive care unit.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastrointestinal endoscopy is rarely performed in neonates due to concerns regarding safety and technical feasibility. This study aimed to evaluate its safety, feasibility, and diagnostic yield, and to explore its role as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in neonatal gastrointestinal diseases. This retrospective study included 42 neonates, both preterm and term, who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy at Shanghai Children's Hospital between 2015 and 2025. Indications for endoscopy, endoscopic findings, therapeutic approaches and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. All neonates underwent successful gastroscopy, including 4 who also received colonoscopy. The cohort included both term and preterm infants. The most common indication was gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly hematemesis. In preterm neonates, the primary indications were feeding intolerance and the need for enteral nutritional support. Abnormal endoscopic findings were identified in over 85.7% of infants, including mucosal erosion, ulcer, hemorrhagic lesion, congenital or acquired mechanical obstruction and inflammation. Endoscopic interventions included topical hemostatic therapy, nasojejunal tube placement, and balloon dilation. No procedure-related complications such as perforation, respiratory deterioration were observed.
conclusionsWith ongoing advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy and increasing clinical experience, its use in neonates has expanded. In some cases, endoscopy serves as an adjunct to diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic management. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Gastrointestinal endoscopy is rarely performed in neonates due to technical limitations and concerns regarding safety. • Most existing studies involve small case series, offering limited data on diagnostic yield and therapeutic potential. WHAT IS NEW: • A 10-year clinical cohort demonstrates that endoscopy is safe and feasible in both term and preterm neonates using ultrathin instruments. • Endoscopy provides substantial diagnostic value for diverse neonatal gastrointestinal conditions and enables targeted therapeutic interventions, including topical hemostatic therapy, Nasojejunal tube placement, and balloon dilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41571784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.