ArticleScientific reports2026
Latent profiles of compassion fatigue among clinical nurse preceptors and their associations with work alienation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the latent profiles of clinical nurse preceptors (CNPs)' compassion fatigue (CF), identify the influencing factors, and examine their association with work alienation. Between July and August 2025, 340 nurse preceptors from a tertiary grade A general hospital in Zhejiang Province were recruited as participants using convenience sampling. The Chinese version of the Professional Quality of Life Scale Version 5 (ProQOL-5) and the Work Alienation Scale (WAS) were used to assess compassion fatigue and work alienation, respectively. Demographic information was also collected from the participants. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was employed to identify potential profiles of compassion fatigue. After screening variables through univariate analysis and multicollinearity tests, multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the influencing factors. Furthermore, a one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in work alienation among different potential profiles, and the results were interpreted based on the job demands-resources (JD-R) model theoretical framework. A total of 320 CNPs were included in the final analysis. The findings of the latent profile analysis indicated that three latent profiles of CNPs' compassion fatigue were identified: high-satisfaction-low-exhaustion group (n = 56, 17.5%), moderate compassion fatigue group (n = 160, 50%), and severe exhaustion group (n = 104, 32.5%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that age, marital status, education, years of preceptorship, experience, employment type, and professional title were significant predictors of compassion fatigue among CNPs. There were statistically significant differences in the work alienation scores among the three latent profiles (P < 0.001). CNPs' compassion fatigue can be categorised into three types, with significant heterogeneity observed among them. Notable differences exist in work alienation among CNPs with different compassion fatigue types. These findings suggest that clinical managers and educators should develop targeted interventions and support systems based on these circumstances. Therefore, formulating such management strategies is crucial for alleviating work alienation among CNPs and will help improve nurse retention rates and the quality of clinical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.