Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41571776›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Explainable artificial intelligence for sedimentary facies segmentation.

Andrea Di Martino, Gianluca Carlini, Alessandro Amorosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea Di Martino *Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, Piazza di Porta San Donato 1, Bologna, 40126, Italy. Andrea.dimartino4@unibo.it.
Gianluca Carlini *HPC Department, CINECA, Casalecchio di Reno, Italy.
Alessandro Amorosi *Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, Piazza di Porta San Donato 1, Bologna, 40126, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in artificial intelligence are transforming geosciences, with growing attention on explainable models to support both scientific research and practical adoption. Here, we present a general yet tailored pipeline for semantic segmentation of sedimentary facies from Holocene core images. We first identify the optimal model architecture, evaluating both convolutional neural networks and Transformer-based backbones, then perform a systematic patch-size ablation to better align with expert-level sedimentological reasoning. Finally, we enhance interpretability through saliency mapping with grad-CAM and predictive entropy, which highlight geologically meaningful regions and quantify model uncertainty. Our results demonstrate that an explainable AI framework not only takes a significant step forward in automatic facies prediction but also provides actionable insights into model behavior. This approach emphasizes the added value of explainable pipelines in critical domains of geosciences, where transparent decision-making is essential for bridging research and real-world applications.

Identifiers

PMID41571776
PMCPMC12902119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.