ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable artificial intelligence for sedimentary facies segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sediment core analysis using artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence are transforming geosciences, with growing attention on explainable models to support both scientific research and practical adoption. Here, we present a general yet tailored pipeline for semantic segmentation of sedimentary facies from Holocene core images. We first identify the optimal model architecture, evaluating both convolutional neural networks and Transformer-based backbones, then perform a systematic patch-size ablation to better align with expert-level sedimentological reasoning. Finally, we enhance interpretability through saliency mapping with grad-CAM and predictive entropy, which highlight geologically meaningful regions and quantify model uncertainty. Our results demonstrate that an explainable AI framework not only takes a significant step forward in automatic facies prediction but also provides actionable insights into model behavior. This approach emphasizes the added value of explainable pipelines in critical domains of geosciences, where transparent decision-making is essential for bridging research and real-world applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.